|
|
| * | |
 FENETRE
SUR LE MONDE |
|
  |
Attaquer l'Irak?  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
| des États-Unis pour strasmag.com dmercer1@att.net |
|
|
|
|
| > Daniel M. Merc" FACE="Verdana">La traduction en françai vision de notre pays par comparaison au sien... | |
| The question on the world stage is whether the United States and its allies should attack
Iraq? This question is a complicated one. With France and Russia now threatening to veto a U.N. resolution, whi="2" COLOR="black"
FACE="verdana,to question the motivations of such actions. Recently the United States congress changed the name of "French fries" to "freedom fries", and "French toast" tch could lead to war one pite Washington's current displeasure for France's position on the Iraqi disarmament, France remains a close friend and ally of Washington. Indeed, it's a friendship, which is more than 200 years old. o "Freedom toast". Despite Washington'tack Iraq in a preemptive strike. According to a Frenchman I spoke to last summer in Quebec City he didn't see the problem in doing so. At that time there was a general sense of the world community The question remains whether to atwever, now, especially around Washington there is a growing concern over Saddam Hussein's ties to terrorism. The White House has tried hard to make the case of a "nexus" between Saddam of ambivalence toward the Iraq situation. Hon proven weak if non-existent. However, Saddam Hussein poses a threat vis-à-vis his weapons of mass destruction. Therefore, a strike against Iraq on the basis of its weapons alone is need and Al Qaeda. Thus far, that connectioninst such a strike. For France and Russia the stakes have been labeled economical, but the non-American press has been quick to point out otherwise. According to Jacques Chirac unilateraed despite the current world opinion agaroval would set a dangerous precedent for the world. France worries the United States is quickly becoming a "hyper-power", but I think otherwise. I think the United States must do what's in itl U.S. action without United Nations appurity. In brief, the U.S. should attack Iraq as quickly as possible—but not before all peaceful methods are tried. |
|
| > Les lecteurs ont la parole_ |
| Vous pouvez nous écrire, engagez vous dans le débat... !<;crire. N'oubliez pas de de préciser à quel article vous faites référence. |
| FENETRE SUR LE MONDE |
|
| >Article |
| > |
> |
"1" FACE="helvetica">MONDE
| DEBATS |
| >Ecrivez nous! >Courrier |
|
| © Les auteurs / Strasbourg Webmag,/TABLE>
| Toute utilisation ou reproduction doit faire l'objet d'une demande écrite.
| Les documents sont publiés sous la responsabilité de leurs auteurs.